EU anti-greenwashing · ECGT / EmpCo · Directive (EU) 2024/825

Green Claims Check — ECGT / EmpCo (EU 2024/825)

Per-claim ECGT verdict ledger for EU marketing copy

Per-claim verdict ledger

What this check returns

Paste your marketing copy and run the check. Each environmental claim is matched against the ECGT / EmpCo ruleset and returned with one of three verdicts:

BANNEDOutright prohibited under the directive (e.g. offsetting-only neutrality, self-made labels). Must be removed.
FLAGPermitted only if specific conditions are met (substantiation, recognised certification, published roadmap). Fix before publishing.
PASSNo prohibited or conditional pattern detected for that phrase.

You also get a compliance score, the matched phrases, the article citations, and a suggested compliant rewrite for every flagged or banned claim.

What is the status, in one line

The ECGT / EmpCo Directive (EU) 2024/825 is in force; national rules apply from 27 September 2026. The Commission issued formal notices to 20 Member States on 28 May 2026. By 17 October 2026, 19 States had communicated measures; Czech and French completeness remains unconfirmed.

Official / primary sources:

BannedGeneric environmental claims (“eco-friendly”, “green”, “climate neutral”) are prohibited unless backed by recognised excellent environmental performance; whole-product claims when only part qualifies, and self-made sustainability labels not based on a certification scheme, are banned outright.
OffsettingClaiming a product has a neutral, reduced or positive environmental impact on the basis of offsetting alone is prohibited — neutrality must rest on verified lifecycle reductions, not bought credits.
DeadlineThe directive entered into force Directive (EU) 2024/825; the transposition deadline was 2026-03-27 (passed — 20/27 Member States missed it, Commission formal notices 2026-05-28), and national rules apply from 2026-09-27.
SubstantiateExplicit environmental claims must be specific, evidence-based and verifiable. The separate Green Claims Directive proposal — which would have added ex-ante third-party substantiation — was put on hold (Commission announced its intention to withdraw, June 2025).

Last updated 2026-10-17 · ruleset 2026.10, verified against Directive (EU) 2024/825 and the proposed Green Claims Directive. Informational screening, not legal advice — verify against the official regulation or a compliance professional. Read the methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Is this the “Green Claims Directive”?: No. This tool checks the ECGT / EmpCo Directive (EU) 2024/825, which is in force and amends the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The standalone “Green Claims Directive” (proposal 2023/0085(COD)) on ex-ante third-party substantiation is a different instrument; the Commission announced its intention to withdraw it on 20 June 2025 and it is on hold with no revival timeline.
When does ECGT / EmpCo apply?: The directive entered into force on 26 March 2024. Member States had to transpose it by 27 March 2026, and the national rules apply to B2C commercial practices from 27 September 2026.
Has France transposed it?: Completeness is unconfirmed. France notified earlier provisions, including L121-2, L541-9-1 and R541-230; these do not establish complete ECGT transposition.
Which Member States have transposed it?: As of 17 October 2026, 19 Member States have communicated measures. Twelve updates and the remaining unknowns are listed above. Notification alone does not establish complete transposition; verify local application.
Are carbon-neutral-via-offsetting claims banned?: Yes. ECGT prohibits claiming a product has a neutral, reduced or positive environmental impact on the basis of greenhouse-gas offsetting alone. Self-made or unverified sustainability labels are also prohibited unless based on a certified scheme or established by a public authority.
Is a compliance score from this tool legally binding?: No. The score and per-claim verdicts are a screening aid using deterministic pattern rules. The tool does not certify compliance, does not bind enforcement authorities, and does not replace counsel review for high-risk campaigns.